Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:02

Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Steelers sign Aaron Rodgers, pending a physical - NBC Sports
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Obscure rock formation in Canada may contain the world's oldest minerals - Live Science
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
How can I fall asleep fast at night?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Discovery of 'mini halo' points to how the early universe was formed - Phys.org
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
USMNT, messy and meek, unravels quickly for its fourth straight defeat - The Washington Post
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
How do I seduce a maid for sex?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?